Peer Review Process
Understanding the IJCHI peer review process
IJCHI follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.
Process Overview
Submission
Author submits manuscript through our online system
Initial Screening
Editorial team checks for completeness and relevance
Assignment to Reviewers
Editor assigns 2-3 expert reviewers
Peer Review
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript (2-3 weeks)
Editorial Decision
Editor makes decision based on reviewer recommendations
Author Notification
Author receives decision with reviewer comments
Revision
If needed, author revises and resubmits
Publication
Accepted paper is published online
Review Timelines
Decision Types
Accept
The manuscript is accepted for publication with no or minor revisions.
Minor Revisions
The manuscript requires minor corrections and will be reviewed by the editor.
Major Revisions
The manuscript requires significant changes and will be sent back to reviewers.
Reject
The manuscript is not suitable for publication in IJCHI.
Quality Assurance
- Double-blind review to ensure impartiality
- At least 2 expert reviewers per manuscript
- Plagiarism detection using iThenticate
- Statistical review when appropriate
- Editorial oversight and final validation
Common Questions
Can I suggest reviewers?
Yes, authors may suggest potential reviewers during submission. The editorial team will consider these suggestions but is not obligated to use them.
Can I request to exclude certain reviewers?
Yes, you may request to exclude specific reviewers if there is a conflict of interest.
What happens if reviewers disagree?
The editor will make a final decision based on all reviews and may seek additional expert opinion.
Can I appeal a decision?
Yes, authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing a detailed response addressing the reviewers' concerns.